Using information Re Search to locate all content with a certain retention label
After retention labels are used to content, either by users or auto-applied, you can make use of search that is content find all items which have certain retention label used.
Whenever you develop a content search, ch se the Retention label condition, and then enter the whole retention label title or an element of the label name and use a wildcard. For more information, see Keyword questions and search conditions for Content Search.
Compare capabilities for retention policies and retention labels
Make use of the table that is following assist you to identify whether or not to make use of retention policy or retention label, based on capabilities.
Remember that you can use both retention policies and retention labels as complementary retention practices. For example
You create and configure a retention label that keeps content forever and include this up to a label policy which you publish to all OneDrive reports. You explain to users just how to manually apply this label to documents that are specific is excluded from automated removal or even modified after five years.
For more information about how exactly retention policies and retention labels work together and how to determine their mixed result, begin to see the next part that explains the principles of retention and exactly what takes precedence.
The concepts of retention, or exactly what takes precedence?
Unlike retention labels, you can use multiple retention policy towards the exact same content. Each retention policy can result in a retain action and an action that is delete. Also, that item is also subject to these actions from the retention label.
In this situation, when things may be at the mercy of numerous retention settings that could conflict with one another, what takes precedence to determine the outcome?
The outcome isn’t which single retention policy or solitary retention label wins, but just how long a product is retained (if applicable) and when something is deleted (if applicable). These two actions are determined independently from each other, from all of the retention settings applied to something.
For example, something might be at the mercy of one retention policy that is configured for a delete-only action, and another retention policy that is configured to retain then delete. Consequently, this product has only one action that is retain two delete actions. The retention and removal actions could be in conflict with each other therefore the two deletion actions might have a conflicting date. To function out of the result, you need to use the maxims of retention.
At a higher level, you will be assured that retention always takes precedence over removal, therefore the longest retention duration victories. These two easy guidelines always determine how long an item are going to be retained.
There are many more factors that determine when an item is going to be deleted, such as the action that is delete a retention label constantly takes precedence over the delete action from the retention policy.
Use the flow that is following understand the retention and deletion results for a solitary item, where each level will act as a tie-breaker for conflicts, from top to bottom. In the event that outcome is dependent upon the level that is first there are not any further conflicts, there isn’t any need certainly to advance to the next level, and so on.
You know which retention label is applied if you are using retention labels Before using this flow to determine the outcome of multiple retention settings on the same item, make sure.
Description for the four levels that are different
Retention wins over deletion. Content won’t be permanently deleted with regards to even offers retention settings to retain it.
Example an message that is email subject to a retention policy for Exchange that is configured to delete things after three years and in addition it features a retention label applied that is configured to retain things for 5 years.
The e-mail message is retained for five years because this retention action takes precedence over deletion. The e-mail message is deleted at the end regarding the five years because of the deferred action that is delete.
The longest retention duration wins. If content is susceptible to multiple retention settings that retain content for various intervals, the content are going to be retained until the end associated with the retention period that is longest.
Example papers into the Marketing SharePoint web site are subject to two retention policies. The first retention policy is configured for all SharePoint web sites to retain items for five years. The 2nd retention policy is configured for particular SharePoint web sites to retain things for a decade.
Papers in this Marketing SharePoint site are retained for ten years because this is the longest retention period.
Explicit wins over implicit for deletions. With conflicts now remedied for retention, just disputes for deletions stay
A retention label ( nevertheless it ended up being used) provides retention that is explicit comparison with retention policies, because the retention settings are applied to an individual product instead of implicitly assigned from the container. This means that an action that is delete a retention label constantly takes precedence over a delete action from any retention policy.
Example A document is susceptible to two retention policies that have an action that is delete of years and a decade correspondingly, as well as a retention label which has a delete action of seven years.
The document is deleted after seven years since the action that is delete the retention label takes precedence.
When you’ve got retention policies only in case a retention policy for the location is scoped to use an include setup ( such as for example particular users for Exchange e-mail) that retention policy takes precedence over unscoped retention policies for the same location.